Skip to Content

NFL Rumors: Did Philadelphia Eagles Exaggerate Michael Vick Significant Injury In Case Nick Foles Had Big Game?

NFL Rumors: Did Philadelphia Eagles Exaggerate Michael Vick Significant Injury In Case Nick Foles Had Big Game?

Hyped by on November 19, 2012 Website: www.thepigskinreport.com

The Philadelphia Eagles said that the injury suffered by quarterback Michael Vick was “significant,” following his concussion that took place in last week’s loss. It now appears as if that designation was exaggerated by the Eagles, simply to make things look better in case Nick Foles had a big game on Sunday against the Washington Redskins.

If Foles had come in and played a great game, then the Eagles could have said that Vick’s injury was still “significant,” meaning they could keep playing the rookie while Vick continued to sit on the bench and watch. This would have squashed some talk of a quarterback controversy.

Voted by:
Voted by robkelley24

No Responses to “NFL Rumors: Did Philadelphia Eagles Exaggerate Michael Vick Significant Injury In Case Nick Foles Had Big Game?” Leave a reply ›

Leave a Reply